|
Cellular
Neurobiology Laboratory
Information Processing in the Retina
Summary: Richard Masland's laboratory studies the microcircuitry
of the retina.
The retina is a complex
sample of neural tissue, a microprocessor located in the eye. Specialized
photoreceptor cells detect light and communicate synaptically with
a network of subsequent neurons, ultimately leading to the transmission
of nerve impulses down the optic nerve. Along the way, the visual
input is shaped and modified for transmission to the brain's higher
centers.
This recoding of the visual
input is surprisingly sophisticated: certain features of the visual
input are accentuated, and others are downplayed. We are still unraveling
the intricacies of the retina's neural codes. The retinal hardware
is concomitantly complex but unraveling its intricacies is worth
the effort because the retina, which is an extension of the central
nervous system, is an accurate prototype of many brain nuclei-their
neuronal structure is no less heterogeneous than that of the retina.
The lessons learned from retinal structure, and the methods developed
for its analysis, thus are applicable to other brain regions.
The Cell Populations
of the Retina
About 10 years ago we set
out to make a comprehensive accounting of the types of neurons that
participate in the retina's computations. As a strategy, this was
a distant cousin to the human genome project: the program is first
to list the players-the gears and wheels that make the machine turn-and
later find out how they are assembled.
The initial phase of this
effort is now complete. A typical mammalian retina contains rod
and cone photoreceptors, 2 types of horizontal cell, 13 types of
bipolar cell (more about these below), ~30 types of amacrine cell,
and a dozen types of ganglion cell. Each cell is a distinct computational
element: it carries out a distinct job in the retina's circuitry.
This shows, among other things, that the florid neuronal complexity
described by the great turn-of-the-century anatomists is real, reflecting
the actual components of an intricate circuitry. The next task is
to make sense of it.
The Fundamental Plan
of the Retina
To understand a retina that
contains 60 different computational elements seems at first a daunting
problem, but the job becomes simpler once a central rule is recognized:
the output of any individual cone photoreceptor is tapped by each
of the dozen distinct types of cone bipolar cell. Why is this simple
statement so important? Because it creates, in the basic backbone
of retinal structure, a dozen separate informational channels, each
transmitting a different aspect of the photoreceptor cell's output.
For example, a single cone photoreceptor (rod photoreceptor cells
work on a different and simpler plan) drives about a half-dozen
different types of ON bipolar cell, which increase their output
when the cone is illuminated. The same cone also innervates a half-dozen
OFF bipolar cells, which decrease their responses during illumination.
In this way two fundamentally different codings of the visual input
are created, at the very first synapse of the visual system.
Each functional class (ON
and OFF) of bipolar cell is further subdivided. For example, there
are cells that respond best to sudden changes in illumination and
other cells that respond best to steady levels of light. To decipher
further the bipolar cells' encodings of the cone's output is an
important task: these dozen or so informational channels represent
"primitives" of vision, the fundamental set of signals
used by the retina to represent the visual world. In a television
set, the world's palette of colors is represented by admixtures
of three signals: red, green, and blue. In the retina, mixtures
of a dozen signals are used to represent the world's panoply of
brightnesses, shapes, motion, and colors. These individual signals
are collected in different combinations by retinal ganglion cells,
which then transmit a combinatorial message to the brain.
Signaling from the Retina
to the Brain
The distinct types of bipolar
cell synapse upon distinct types of retinal ganglion cell, transmitting
to each that bipolar cell's unique view of the world. But the matching
is not always one-to-one, and the final output of a ganglion cell
is also controlled by feedback and feedforward signals from amacrine
cells, an enormously diverse group of locally acting interneurons.
These can create highly specialized properties in ganglion cells.
For example, an amacrine cell called the starburst cell enables
some ganglion cells to signal the direction of stimulus motion.
(We proposed that this was the case in 1984; after much seesawing
of the evidence, it was finally proved correct during the past year.)
Thus, ganglion cells mix and match among inputs from bipolar and
amacrine cells to create the retina's final array of encodings of
the visual world.
To which features of the
visual input are the ganglion cells sensitive? Remarkably, the answer
is only partly known. We recently surveyed the structural types
of ganglion cell present in the rabbit, a fairly representative
mammalian retina. We used four independent methods of identifying
the cells, and each method revealed 12 morphologically distinct
ganglion cell types. Only about half of these cell types have been
well characterized with respect to their coding of visual stimuli.
What Does the Retina's
Structural Complexity Mean for Vision?
Our new understanding of
the retina's structure points to computational sophistication, and
a spate of recent studies from our lab and others document unsuspected
subtleties in the retina's processing of visual information. Some
of the most dramatic effects are mediated by wide-field amacrine
cells, which cause the retina's messages to the brain to depend
not only on the immediate stimulus but also on the visual context
in which it occurs.
Perhaps the most fundamental
issue, though, is to learn how the codings represented by the dozen
or so retinal ganglion cell types are matched to the structure of
the natural visual world. We seek here a more precise and powerful
"language of vision" with which to parse the world of
visual inputs and match them to the properties of the different
ganglion cell types. The circuitry of retinal ganglion cells did
not evolve in a vacuum; it evolved in response to the set of objects
present in the natural world. We hope that the ganglion cell structures,
which define the discrete coding streams into which the visual input
is parceled, will point us toward the fundamental visual code.
A Great Three-Dimensional
Jigsaw Puzzle
Although the central organizing
principle of the retina now seems clear, we have far to go to learn
how specific microcircuits function. A classic example is the direction-selective
ganglion cell, but it is also safe to say that the circuitry for
even the simplest ganglion cell types remains obscure in detail.
We have the list of players, but can only begin to see how they
are wired.
The daunting task of deciphering
that wiring can hardly be approached by classical techniques. Recently,
however, genetic introduction of marker compounds and transneuronal
tracing methods have made a connectivity map of the retina an attainable
goal. In addition, new mouse strains reliably and reproducibly express
fluorescent proteins in defined subsets of neurons. These allow
certain types of dual-fluorescence experiments that would otherwise
be impractical.
|
|
Neurosurgery
Clinical Units
|
|
|